Lawyers for NDC and Mr John Dramani Mahama, the petitioners in the 2020 election petition, have filed another motion to request the 1st Respondent, the Electoral Commission (EC) to produce some documents for inspection within three days. The filing of this new motion comes barely after the NDC’s motion that sought to compel the EC to provide answers to some questions known in legal parlance as interrogatories were dismissed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner through his legal team, this time, is requesting among others the originals of the constituency election results collation forms (Form 9) for all constituencies in Ghana, the originals of the constituency election results summary sheets (Form 10) for all constituencies in Ghana. The other documents demanded are; the originals of the regional presidential election results collation forms (Form 11) for all regions in Ghana, the originals of the regional presidential election results summary sheets (Form 12) for all regions. The remaining documents are; the original of the declaration of the presidential results form (Form 13) and the Records of the alleged updates of the purported declaration of the presidential election results on 9th December 2020 of the results of the four (4) constituencies in the Greater Accra Region. Read the full statement below: Source: modernghana.com

The Supreme Court has dismissed a motion by former President John Mahama seeking permission to elicit answers to some 12 interrogatories from the Electoral Commission. Among others, lawyers for the petitioner are asking the EC to answer if the National Communications Authority (NCA) played any role or facilitated in any way, the transmission of the election results to its headquarters. Again, Mr Mahama wants to know how the Chairperson of the EC, Jean Mensa, arrived at the figures she used in declaring candidate Nana Akufo-Addo as the winner of the 2020 presidential poll. Lead Counsel Tsatsu Tsikata argues that the interrogatories are critical as it would help the apex court determine the authenticity of the results that saw the NPP presidential candidate, emerging as the winner of the 2020 polls. But the EC’s lawyer, Justin Amenuvor contends that Mr Tsikata is using the back door to introduce matters that are not stated in their earlier petition. He explained that most of the questions are not in contention and have either been answered by the EC or is information that John Mahama is well aware of because he deployed agents across the country. Giving its verdict on the motion, the Supreme Court held the view that Lawyer Tsatsu was relying on CI 47 while the current rule in force relating to the Supreme Court is the CI 99. Also, the request requires the exercise of discretionary power that is granted when a case for relevance is made but since this has not been established hence the decision to dismiss the motion. The seven-member panel of Judges hearing the petition includes Chief Justice Anin-Yeboah; Justices Yaw Appau, Marful Sau, Professor Ashie Kotei, Mariama Owusu, Nene Amegatcher, and Gertrude Tokonor. Meanwhile, the legal representation for Mr John Mahama includes Tony Lithur led by Tsatsu Tsikata, while Lawyer Justin Amenuvor and Lawyer A. Asamoah are the lawyers for the Electoral Commission of Ghana who is the 1st Respondent; and Akoto Ampaw with Frank Davies, Kwaku Asirifi, and Yaw Oppong represent the 2nd Respondent who is the President, Akufo-Addo. Background The National Democratic Congress’ (NDC) flagbearer, John Dramani Mahama has petitioned the Supreme Court to order a second round of the December 7, election. According to the former President, the votes obtained by New Patriotic Party (NPP) candidate, President Nana Akufo-Addo and himself in the December 7, election as declared by the EC Chair were not enough to be declared the winner. In his petition to the Supreme Court Wednesday, Mr Mahama said, “The claim that percentage of votes obtained by the 2nd Respondent [Nana Akufo-Addo] was 51.595% [6,730,413] of the total valid votes that she distinctly stated to have been 13,434,574 was a manifest error, as votes cast for 2nd Respondent would amount to 50.098% and not the 51.595% erroneously declared.” He said the 1st Respondent in her December 9 declaration said the NDC candidate obtained 6,214,889 being 47.366% of the valid votes. “From the total votes cast of 13,434,574, petitioner’s percentages would reduce to 46.260% and not the 47.366% erroneously declared. “The percentage attribute to all but one of the other candidates by Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa were all incorrect,” he said. The former President argued that if all the valid votes for all the candidates who contested the election are put together, it would total “13,121,111, a figure that is completely missing from the purported declaration by Mrs Jean Adukwei Mensa on December 9, and the purported rectification on December 10.” Mr Mahama said the percentage of all the valid votes for the 12 contesting candidates “would yield a total of 100.03%.” This he said is a “mathematical and statistical impossibility, a further proof of the wrongfulness and unconstitutionality of the purported declaration.” Source: myjoyonline.com